« | »

Etodolac 400mg Pills $115.00

By Dan Fleshler | February 14, 2008

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 James Besser has a balanced and informative piece on the ongoing Rob Malley fracas in New York Jewish Week. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Among other things, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 we learn that the offensive smear campaign against Malley and, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 by extension, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Obama has not abated: “In the days leading up to this week’s Democratic primary in Maryland, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Jewish voters in Baltimore and the Maryland suburbs of Washington began getting e-mails warning that Sen. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Barack Obama is being influenced by “anti-Israel” advisers, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 and pointing to one in particular: former Clinton administration official Robert Malley.”

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Some of Malley’s former government colleagues have decided they are going to weigh in and defend Malley in the public arena. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 I’ve been forwarded a copy of a statement they have signed. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 If there are people you know who might be susceptible to the smear campaign, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 please let them know what Berger, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Indyk, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Kurtzer, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Miller and Ross have to say:

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Over the past several weeks, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 a series of vicious, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 personal attacks have been launched against one of our colleagues, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Robert Malley, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 who served as President Clinton’s Special Assistant for Arab-Israeli affairs. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 They claim that he harbours an anti-Israeli agenda and has sought to undermine Israel’s security. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 These attacks are unfair, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 inappropriate and wrong. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 They are an effort to undermine the credibility of a talented public servant who has worked tirelessly over the years to promote Arab-Israeli peace and US national interests. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 They must stop. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 We have real differences among us about how best to conduct US policy toward the Middle East and what is the right way to build a lasting two-state solution that protects Israel’s security. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 But whatever differences do exist, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 there is no disagreement among us on one core issue that transcends partisan or other divides: that the US should not and will not do anything to undermine Israel’s safety or the special relationship between our two nations. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 We have worked with Rob closely over the years and have no doubt he shares this view and has acted
consistent with it. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 We face a critical period in the Middle East that demands sustained, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 determined and far-sighted engagement by the United States. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 It is not a time for scurrilous attacks against someone who deserves our respect.

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Sincerely, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00
Samuel (Sandy) Berger
Former National Security Advisor

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Amb. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Martin Indyk
Former Ambassador to Israel

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Amb. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Daniel C. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Kurtzer
Former Ambassador to Israel and Egypt
and Assistant Secretary of
State for Near East Affairs

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Aaron David Miller
Former Senior Adviser for Arab-Israeli Negotiations, etodolac 400mg pills $115.00
Department of State

Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Amb. Etodolac 400mg pills $115.00 Dennis Ross
Former Special Envoy of the President
to the Middle East

Average Rating: 5 out of 5 based on 186 user reviews.

Topics: American foreign policy, Israel, Middle East peace process | 23 Comments »

23 Responses to “Hydrazide 25mg Tablets $1,064.00”

  1. Jonathan Mark Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 5:28 pm

    Has anyone even established that Malley has a role in the Obama campaign? Has Obama ever met him or communicated with him?

    Does Obama even know who Malley is? A lot of people don’t.

    Much ado about nothing.

  2. Dan Fleshler Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 5:32 pm

    Read the article. It explains his role.

  3. Richard Witty Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 7:01 pm

    Where’s the link to the article?

  4. Dan Fleshler Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 7:08 pm

    Richard, click on “James Besser”

  5. Marco Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 7:15 pm

    I am in the minority among Dan Fleshler’s fans (and I do count myself among them), but I had hoped that Malley would be someone who would advocate that the American-Israel relationship be a lot less “special.” Walt and Mearsheimer did not make a convincing case about some things, but when they said Israel should be treated like “any other country,” it is hard for me to understand how any American could argue with that.

  6. Tom Mitchell Says:
    February 14th, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    Marco,
    I’m quite sure that there are any number of things that are hard for you to understand.

  7. Jonathan Mark Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 12:02 am

    “””Israel should be treated like “any other country,”””

    OK, continue to treat Israel like any other close ally of the US.

    S’okay with me.

  8. Marco Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 12:10 am

    The UK is a close ally. How much financial aid does it get from us?

  9. Jonathan Mark Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 1:25 am

    The US ally Egypt gets two billion a year in aid from the US.

    As I said, treat Israel like any other close ally of the US.

    You got a problem with that? Why?

  10. Richard Witty Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 4:11 am

    “The UK is a close ally. How much financial aid does it get from us?”

    Historically, WW2 and Nato included, dozens of billions annually.

    As they spend on the US.

  11. Marco Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Come on, fellas. You can’t be serious. There is no comparison between the aid Israel has gotten over the years and the aid given to any other country. At one point, if I’m not mistaken, it was something like 20% of our entire foreign aid budget (might have the percentage wrong, but it was very high). I suppose a reasonable justification could have been made for that aid, especially the military aid, when Israel was not the fourth strongest military power in the world(although I still would have disagreed with the amount lavished on Israel). And at least there was an argument that Israel was a valuable bulwark against the Soviet Union during the Cold War. But how can you justify the amounts it continues to receive today???

  12. Richard Witty Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 11:23 am

    “was something like 20% of our entire foreign aid budget (might have the percentage wrong, but it was very high). ”

    If so, that would be more a statement of the vacuity of American generosity.

    “But how can you justify the amounts it continues to receive today?”

    I can’t justify every single dollar. But, on the whole, the reason that it is supported is because it is a comprehensive friend (trade, community, religious, a civil democracy) and is under attack from relentless and horrific parties that employ terror as chosen means.

    Also, you don’t really have a clue to what extent Israel is a military, intelligence, geo-political ally or not.

    Again,
    If you undertook an accounting of the beneficiaries of US military expenditure, a small proportion of it would be solely attributable to exclusively domestic defense. The majority would be offensive (which I oppose) and multi-laterally defensive (which I support).

    The aid that US gives Israel is more than average, but NOT astounding. The US provides FAR more expenditure to NATO or South Korea for example, in which tens of thousands of troups are permanently stationed.

  13. Jonathan Mark Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 11:55 am

    “””Come on, fellas. You can’t be serious. There is no comparison between the aid Israel has gotten over the years and the aid given to any other country.”””

    Marco’s repetition of a false statement doesn’t make it so.

    In reality Egypt gets more than two billion annually, Israel gets three billion. The numbers are comparable.

    “””At one point, if I’m not mistaken, it was something like 20% of our entire foreign aid budget (might have the percentage wrong, but it was very high).”””

    And about 15% for Egypt.

  14. Teddy Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    Marco, as is his wont, prompted a debate about something that has nothing to do with topic at hand.

    My question is: Who, precisely, is sending around all of these emails slamming Malley? Is it just people who are right-wing on the Israeli-Palestinian question but have no politically partisan agenda? Is it idiots in the Hillary Clinton camp? Is it Republicans who want Hillary to be the nominee because they think Hillary will be easier to beat (some of them voted for Hillary in recent primaries, according to CNN)?

    If anyone can show that the Clinton campaign or those on the fringes of it are encouraging this smearing and sliming, THAT would be a major, and deplorable story.

  15. Jonathan Mark Says:
    February 15th, 2008 at 1:32 pm

    It wouldn’t be a major story, because in the overall scheme of things few care about Robert Malley.

    Plus, people who wanted to would have a right to criticize Robert Malley in any event.

    As for “slamming” someone, that is politics in the USA. Everybody gets slammed. It’s like pro rassling. That makes it entertaining.

  16. Richard Witty Says:
    February 16th, 2008 at 9:49 am

    The link didn’t work.

  17. Richard Witty Says:
    February 16th, 2008 at 9:50 am

    The problem with smears is that they are smears.

    They are an attempt to harm a third party for one’s own, or one’s cause’s, benefit.

  18. Dan Fleshler Says:
    February 16th, 2008 at 10:04 am

    Try it now. They were off-line for awhile. It’s a front page story so you can also just go to http://www.thejewishweek.com.

  19. Bill Pearlman Says:
    February 16th, 2008 at 10:21 am

    Rob Malley has worked for the Arabs, is anti-Israel, and has a father who was really anti-Israel. Pointing that out is in no way a smear, it’s the truth. And I don’t care what “Bakers Jew Boys” have to say. Not to mention “Sandy Burglar”.

  20. Richard Witty Says:
    February 16th, 2008 at 2:35 pm

    Its an irrelevant truth.

    To say it once is an inquiry, to repeat is a smear.

    Obama has the means and the breadth of advisors to hear conflicting perspectives and assimilate them.

    Its only when a candidate has monochromatic voices around him/her, that policies become impotent for their inflexibility.

    The variety of perspectives is an asset, not a liability.

  21. Nora Says:
    February 19th, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    Hi,

    Was the letter from Indyk, Ross, et al published on the Web? If so, where? If not, where else can it be found?

    Thanks,

    Nora

  22. Dan Fleshler Says:
    February 19th, 2008 at 7:48 pm

    Nora, it was just distributed to a few folks and then it was picked up on all kinds of blogs. But I don’t think the letter was published by itself. You can find it quoted again by MJ Rosenberg:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mj-rosenberg/smearing-rob-malley_b_87290.html

    Also was picked up by the Magnes Zionist and Tikun Olam, which can be found on the blogroll to the right.

    Best,
    Dan

  23. facebook Says:
    September 28th, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    now i can say its important to know the real enemy and stop believe the media lies

Comments