I took a break from my day job to do a quick scan of the reactions to Obama’s speech in Cairo. The most instructive one thus far comes from Daniel Gordis of the Shalem Center, whose post can be found on the NY Times blog. There has been much talk of late about Obama’ desire to be a transformative president. Gordis spells out the transformation that he hopes our President will spark in Israel. I share those hopes. Here is the post, without additional commentary:
Forcing Clarity on Israel
by Daniel Gordis
While President Obamaâ€™s speech was addressed to the Arab world, it had been nervously anticipated in Israel, as well. In its aftermath, some Israelis are quibbling with word choices or wondering whether he is naÃ¯ve in believing that Hamas might renounce terror or that Iranians can be entrusted with civilian nuclear capacity. Others are assailing his comments about settlements.
For years, we fudged on painful questions. That posture may no longer be possible.
But the real news is that contrary to what many expected, or feared, President Obama assumed positions virtually identical to those of Israelâ€™s political center â€“- namely, that the Palestinians must renounce violence and recognize Israelâ€™s right to exist, while Israel must cease settlement building and permit a Palestinian state to arise. Now, Benjamin Netanyahuâ€™s problem is that itâ€™s difficult to distinguish between President Obama and Tzipi Livni. And in Israelâ€™s recent elections, Livni and her Kadima party won more votes than anyone else.
But the major â€œproblemâ€ that the speech poses for Israelâ€™s leaders is that Israelis are finally going to have to make painful decisions about our future. No longer will Israelâ€™s fractious politics provide a curtain behind which to hide. Will we abide a Palestinian state, or are we committed to the present stalemate as a matter of principle? Are we committed to keeping the West Bank (for reasons of security, history or theology), or are we open to withdrawing if a genuine peace accord is possible? If all Jews will have to depart the West Bank, what about Arabs in Israel? For years, weâ€™ve fudged on these painful questions; with President Obama, that may no longer be possible.
Once Israelis grow accustomed to the new tenor emanating from Washington, we may see todayâ€™s speech in a different light. Barack Obama may or may not bring peace to the Middle East, but he may well force clarity, and perhaps disciplined policy, on an Israeli society that has long desperately needed it.